JPMorgan Ends Gemini Onboarding After Winklevoss Critique
- JPMorgan halted Gemini’s onboarding after Winklevoss’s critique of fees.
- Potential impact on Gemini’s fiat-crypto operations.
- High community support for open banking rights.

JPMorgan halted the re-onboarding of Gemini following criticism from Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss regarding new data access fees, asserting the move was a response to the public comment.
The halting of Gemini’s onboarding by a major bank could impact crypto exchanges, fiat transactions, and exacerbate tensions between banks and the digital asset sector.
JPMorgan halts onboarding of the cryptocurrency platform Gemini after public criticism from Tyler Winklevoss. The conflict arose over new data access fees that JPMorgan implemented, a move that Winklevoss claims could hurt fintech firms financially.
Tyler Winklevoss, co-founder and CEO of Gemini, criticized these fees on public platforms. As a response, JPMorgan decided to halt the onboarding of Gemini, which had previously faced banking service issues during “Operation Chokepoint 2.0”.
The immediate effect of JPMorgan’s action is felt in Gemini’s ability to move fiat funds, impacting its operations involving cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH. Users rely on Gemini for seamless financial transactions, making banking access critical.
The financial implications are extensive, potentially affecting user transactions and cryptocurrency accessibility. Political and regulatory tensions emerge, as the decision raises questions about banking openness and fintech growth under regulatory frameworks.
Community sentiment is strong, with many supporting Winklevoss’s stance for free financial data access as per the Open Banking Rule. This controversy highlights ongoing challenges between traditional banking systems and fintech firms seeking regulatory clarity.
JPMorgan’s new fees for data access will bankrupt fintechs that play a critical role linking customers’ bank accounts to crypto exchanges like Gemini. The Open Banking Rule gives users the right to access their data — free. These fees violate that right. — Tyler Winklevoss
The halt in onboarding may lead to shifts in user behavior as they navigate alternative platforms. Historically, restrictions like these decrease exchange liquidity and influence user confidence, potentially prompting regulatory discussions on banking transparency and fairness.